Some of the highlights (or lowlights as the case may be) of the report are:
- The aggregate funded ratio dropped from 49.2% to 49.0%.
- The aggregate non-phased-in contribution rate increased from 41.08% to 42.36%. Employers who chose to pay a lower phased-in rate to help pay the increased costs caused by the Fields case have a lower rate that will be made up in future years.
- PSPRS' total assets increased about $199 million from $6.018 billion to $6.217 billion.
- PSPRS' total liability increased about $453 million $12.233 billion to $12.686 billion.
- PSPRS' total unfunded liability increased about $254 million from $6.229 billion to $6.483 billion.
- The actuary projects the aggregate contribution rate to stay between 42 and 43 percent through 2027, though this is likely to be too low since the actuary used the old 7.85% expected rate of return (ERR) and not the current 7.5% ERR.
- There were 18,409 active, contributing members of PSPRS at the end of FY 2015 versus 18,526 at the end of FY 2014, a decrease of 117.
- There were 11,034 retirees and beneficiaries and 1,675 Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) members for a total of 12,709 non-contributing members of PSPRS at the end of FY 2015. This is an increase of 626 from the 12,083 (10,524 + 1,559) non-contributing members at the end of FY 2014. (Depending on when a member entered the DROP, the member may make no contributions to PSPRS while in the program, or the member may continue to contribute to PSPRS while in the program then receive a full refund of the accrued contributions and 2% interest when the member finally leaves work. Regardless, PSPRS ends with no employer or employee contributions for the up-to-five years a member is in the DROP.)
- The FY 2015 ratio of active, contributing members to non-contributing members dropped to 1.45. Last fiscal year the ratio was 1.53.
- The average annual pay for an active, contributing member increased from $75,048 to $76,114.
- The average annual retirement benefit for retirees and beneficiaries increased from $51,616 to $51,833.
- The average annual pay for a member in the DROP increased from $64,173 to $64,659.
- Employers contributed about $448 million to PSPRS in FY 2015 versus about $414 million in FY 2014.
- Employees contributed about $165 million to PSPRS in FY 2015 versus about $152 million in FY 2014.
The Great Recession gave PSPRS two large investment losses in FY 2008 and FY 2009, but these two losses are far enough in the past that they are now beginning to fall out of the seven-year smoothing period. The FY 2008 smoothed loss of about $119 million was eliminated from the calculation of the FY 2015 funded ratio and replaced by a smaller loss incurred in FY 2015. This dropped PSPRS' recognized loss over the seven-year period by about $82 million from $282 million to $200 million, and yet, PSPRS' funded ratio continued to drop and the employer contribution rate continued to rise. This means that liabilities are continuing to grow faster than assets, even as the negative impact of the Great Recession begins to lose some of its effect on PSPRS.
In one of the few years when we could expect to see some improvement in PSPRS finances we instead have another disappointing year. What do we have to look forward to in the near future? PSPRS' lowering of its ERR from 7.85% to 7.50% will raise the aggregate employer contribution rate 3%, and a plaintiff victory in the Hall case could raise it another 6% on top of that. So we could see the aggregate employer rate increase by as much 9% over the next year. Of course, who knows what is really going to happen next year. The only certainty is that no matter what happens PSPRS and its Board of Trustees will be there to tell us all how great a job they are doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Relevant comments are welcome, but please adhere to the following rules:
1. No profanity or vulgarity.
2. No spam or advertising.
3. No copyrighted material may be posted unless you are the copyright owner.
4. Stay on topic.
5. Disagreement is fine, but please avoid ad hominem attacks.
Comments reflect the views of the authors alone, and do not reflect the opinion of this website.